Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868477›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2025

Baseline nowcasting methods for handling delays in epidemiological data.

Kaitlyn E Johnson, Maria L Tang, Emily Tyszka, Laura Jones, Barbora Nemcova, Daniel Wolffram, Rosa Ergas, Nicholas G Reich, Sebastian Funk, Jonathon Mellor and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kaitlyn E JohnsonInfectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, England, NW5 1JG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8011-0012
Maria L TangChief Data Officer Group, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Emily TyszkaMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6088-4017
Laura JonesMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9214-0661
Barbora NemcovaInstitute of Statistics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7565-4145
Daniel WolfframInstitute of Statistics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Rosa ErgasMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicholas G ReichUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Sebastian FunkInfectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, England, NW5 1JG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2842-3406
Jonathon MellorChief Data Officer Group, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Johannes BracherInstitute of Statistics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Sam AbbottInfectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, England, NW5 1JG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8057-8037

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Up-to-date real-time disease surveillance data can provide critical public health insights, however reporting delays can create downward bias in the latest data. Nowcasting methods designed to correct for this bias remain underused in public health practice due to their complexity, lack of tailored documentation, or technical barriers. Methodological advances in nowcasting are also hampered by the absence of standardised benchmarks for evaluating new methods. Methods: To address these needs, we developed a family of nowcasting methods and an accompanying R package, Results: Our baseline method improved estimates compared to unadjusted data across all case studies. We found that the optimal choice of baseline method specification depends on context but that our default method specification performed well in a range of settings. Applied to UKHSA norovirus data, our method helped us understand the performance of the model currently used in public health practice. Conclusions: Our method and software can be used both as a straightforward nowcasting method and provides a benchmark for nowcasting model development.

Indexed as

benchmarkinginfectious disease surveillancenowcastingright-truncation

Identifiers

PMID41868477
PMCPMC13005074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.