ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Decisive role of brain biopsy in atypical tumefactive demyelinating lesions: A case report.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In neuroimaging, tumefactive demyelinating lesions (TDLs), which are rare inflammatory lesions of the central nervous system, can sometimes resemble infectious or malignant processes. Radiologic distinction is frequently made more difficult by their huge size, mass impact, and contrast enhancement patterns, especially in atypical or recurrent presentations. We describe a 32-year-old woman who has several tumefactive brain lesions and recurring localized neurological impairments. On post-contrast T1-weighted images, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed significant periventricular, juxtacortical, and infratentorial lesions with noticeable vasogenic edema and peripheral open-ring enhancement. Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) both exhibited no blooming or actual diffusion restriction. Advanced imaging revealed moderately raised and regionally decreased perfusion on magnetic resonance imaging (MR) perfusion investigations, while MR spectroscopy revealed elevated choline ratios and a lactate peak. These results supported demyelination but were insufficient to rule out neoplastic illness. Even after partial radiological regression brought on by high-dose corticosteroids and plasmapheresis, diagnostic uncertainty persisted due to overlapping imaging results. As a result, a brain biopsy was performed, and the findings were consistent with tumefactive multiple sclerosis (MS): confluent demyelination with inflammatory infiltrates and relative axonal preservation. Histopathological evidence enabled targeted immunotherapy, which subsequently improved radiological and clinical results. This case illustrates the benefits and drawbacks of advanced neuroimaging in tumefactive demyelinating diseases, as well as the usefulness of brain biopsies as a conclusive diagnosis technique in situations where radiologic results are unclear and directly impact patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.