ArticleCureus2026
Regenerative High Purity Type I Collagen Scaffold for Breast Cancer Excision Repair and Reconstruction: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the preferred treatment for early-stage breast cancer; however, excision-related volume loss frequently results in contour deformity, asymmetry, and reduced patient satisfaction. Conventional volume displacement and replacement techniques are limited by donor-site morbidity, technical complexity, and unpredictable aesthetic outcomes. High-purity type I collagen (HPTC) scaffolds represent a regenerative, biocompatible strategy designed to provide immediate volume support while promoting host tissue integration.
methodsThis prospective, single-arm, multicenter clinical trial was conducted at two tertiary care centers in India. Forty women undergoing BCS with an anticipated postoperative volume loss ≥20% received intraoperative implantation of an HPTC scaffold into the excision cavity. Patients were followed for two months. The primary outcome was breast volume restoration success, defined as ≥80% objective volume retention at two months with patient satisfaction ≥7/10. Secondary outcomes included objective volumetric analysis using MRI and three-dimensional surface imaging, radiologic integration assessed by the MRI Integration Score (MIS), cosmetic outcomes measured using the BREAST-Q, and safety. Longitudinal outcomes were analyzed using repeated-measures statistics, with effect sizes calculated to assess clinical relevance.
resultsAll 40 enrolled patients completed the two-month follow-up. The composite primary endpoint (≥80% volume retention plus patient satisfaction ≥7/10) was achieved in 82.5% of patients (33/40). Mean breast volume retention at two months was 88.6% ± 9.8%, significantly exceeding the predefined benchmark of 75% (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.39). MIS demonstrated progressive scaffold integration, improving from 3.2 ± 1.1 postoperatively to 9.1 ± 1.4 at eight weeks (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 2.8), with no suspicious imaging features. BREAST-Q "Satisfaction with Breasts" scores improved by 24.7 points from baseline (54.2 ± 8.6 to 78.9 ± 7.4; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.8). No device-related serious adverse events occurred; minor complications (seroma 10%, infection 5%) resolved with conservative management.
conclusionHPTC scaffold implantation following BCS demonstrates excellent safety, robust early volume restoration (88.6% retention at two months), progressive biological integration, and clinically meaningful improvement in patient satisfaction. This minimally invasive regenerative approach avoids donor-site morbidity while achieving outcomes comparable to traditional oncoplastic techniques, warranting evaluation in randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up to assess durability and radiotherapy response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.