ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator utilization in coronary artery spasm: A case series of cardiac arrest survivors and a patient with typical angiography.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery spasm (CAS) can trigger severe angina pectoris, acute coronary syndrome, or sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Calcium channel blockers and nitrates are recommended treatments, but the role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) remains controversial. This study explored ICD application in CAS via a case series of cardiac arrest survivors and a patient with typical angiography findings. Case presentation: Four patients with recurrent angina (3 with prior cardiac arrest) were diagnosed with suspected or definite CAS based on predefined criteria and coronary angiography findings: transient ST-segment elevation, nitrate-responsive coronary narrowing, and no identifiable reversible triggers. Three patients with documented ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) or SCA underwent ICD implantation, while the one without such history did not. During 3.6 ± 1.3 years of follow-up, all experienced recurrent angina (reduced by maximum-tolerated calcium antagonists plus long-acting nitrates). VT/VF events in two ICD recipients were successfully terminated by anti-tachycardia pacing or shocks. Conclusions: This case series confirms recurrent angina is common in CAS and highlights the efficacy of calcium antagonists and nitrates. ICD implantation may be warranted for CAS patients who survive VT/VF, a strategy supported by the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.