Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868398›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Human-animal bonds: first cross-sectional study in laboratory animal care professionals in Argentina.

Gisela Ariana Marcoppido, Juan Santiago Guidobono, Marcos Trangoni, María Aluminé Mattana, Agustina Resasco, Silvina Laura Diaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gisela Ariana MarcoppidoInstituto de Patobiología/Instituto de Patobiologia Veterinaria (IP/IPVET), UEDD INTA-CONICET, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Hurlingham, Argentina.
Juan Santiago GuidobonoInstituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA), CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marcos TrangoniInstituto de Biotecnología/Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IB/IABIMO), UEDD INTA-CONICET, CICVyA, CNIA, INTA Castelar, Castelar, Argentina.
María Aluminé MattanaFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Agustina ResascoBiological Research Facility, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Silvina Laura DiazConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working with laboratory animals can bring satisfaction but may also result in workplace stress. The established bonds between laboratory animals and their caretakers can make a person feel physically, mentally or emotionally uncomfortable. This phenomenon has been described as Compassion Fatigue (CF), a combination of burnout (BO) and secondary traumatic stress (STS). Although CF has been recognized in the field of laboratory animal science, the information about laboratory animal workers is still scarce. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of CF and Compassion satisfaction (CS) and identify risk factors in laboratory animal care professionals (LACP) in Argentina. We conducted our study during 2.024. A total of 106 LACP completed an online survey regarding social support, euthanasia, environmental enrichment, stress and pain caused to animals, professional quality of life and human-animal interactions. Components of CF were associated with less control over euthanasia procedures and the frequency of conducting the procedure, the use of toys as enrichment tools, and talking to animals and introducing themselves to society as LACP. CS was associated with the desire to add more enrichment and pride in communicating their jobs to others. These results provide empirical information that can contribute to the development of intervention policies to improve the quality of life of both the people who work with laboratory animals and the animals they care for.

Indexed as

burnout (BO)compassion fatigue (CF)compassion satisfaction (CS)environmental enrichmenteuthanasiahuman-animal interactionsprofessional quality of life

Identifiers

PMID41868398
PMCPMC13003596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.