ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Effects of Sphingomonads on sugar beet growth and rhizosphere microbiota under continuous cropping.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Welan Gum, a Bacterial Polysaccharide, Promotes Maize Seedling Growth Through TOR and MAPK Signaling Pathways.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Antagonistic Microbial Consortia Reduce Phytopathogenic Pressure and Improve Rhizosphere Functioning of Sugar Beet Under Short-Rotation Cropping Systems.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sugar beet is a crucial sugar crop, and its yield and quality are vulnerable to the adverse effects of continuous cropping. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria function as biological control agents and exhibit high potential for crop growth promotion. Methods: In this study, soil subjected to continuous sugar beet cropping was selected as the experimental substrate to evaluate the effects of Results: The results indicated that Sphingomonads inoculation significantly improved the agronomic performance of sugar beet seedlings, as evidenced by increased plant height, stem diameter, aboveground and root fresh weight, and enhanced nitrogen and phosphorus uptake. In addition, inoculation increased soil pH, available potassium content, and sucrase activity. Microbial community analysis revealed that all inoculation treatments markedly altered the diversity and composition of the rhizosphere microbiome. Compared with the continuous cropping control, the inoculated soils exhibited a significantly higher abundance of Pseudomonadota, exceeding that observed under crop rotation. Moreover, beneficial genera (e.g., Conclusion: Overall, Sphingomonad inoculation effectively regulated the structure and function of the rhizosphere microbial community, improved soil enzyme activity and nutrient availability, and promoted sugar beet seedling growth. This study provides a theoretical foundation and potential biocontrol strategy for mitigating continuous cropping obstacles in sugar beet cultivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.