Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868329›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Adsorptive and photocatalytic strategies for carmoisine removal: mechanisms, material innovations, and environmental implications.

Muhammad Arif

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Muhammad ArifDepartment of Chemistry, School of Science, University of Management and Technology Lahore 54770 Pakistan Muhammadarif2861@yahoo.com Muhammadarif@umt.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-6675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carmoisine (CM) (also called azorubine or Acid Red 14) poses severe environmental and health risks due to its chemical stability, persistence in environment, and generation of toxic aromatic amines. Conventional treatment methods such as coagulation, oxidation, membrane filtration, and biological degradation are ineffective and can lead to secondary pollution and incomplete mineralization. Thus, adsorptive and photocatalytic processes have emerged as efficient and sustainable alternatives for CM removal. Adsorption enables rapid dye capture through surface interactions, while photocatalysis achieves complete degradation through light-induced reactive oxygen species. Their integration in adsorptive-photocatalytic composites enhances dye pre-concentration, promotes

Identifiers

PMID41868329
PMCPMC13003538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.