Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868288›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pain research2026

The Effect of Cocktail Formula Solution for Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Major Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Study.

Dan Lu, Hongzhou Chen, Jian Hu, Xuemei He, Lei Bao, Bo Xu, Siyu Zhang, Jingsheng Fan, Rurong Wang

Abstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dan LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital/Shangjin Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Hongzhou ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital/Shangjin Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Jian HuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Xuemei HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital/Shangjin Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Lei BaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital/Shangjin Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Bo XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital/Shangjin Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Siyu ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital/Shangjin Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Jingsheng Fan *Department of Anesthesiology, Dongnan Hospital, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Rurong Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and duration of a single bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) using a cocktail formula solution compared to plain ropivacaine in patients undergoing laparoscopic major upper abdominal surgery. Patients and Methods: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 60 patients scheduled for laparoscopic major upper abdominal surgery were randomized into two groups. The experimental group received ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB with 40 mL of a cocktail solution (0.375% ropivacaine + 2μg/mL epinephrine + 0.1mg/mL dexamethasone + 2.5mg/mL magnesium sulfate + 15mg/mL sodium bicarbonate). The control group received bilateral ESPB with 40 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine alone. Both groups received postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). The primary outcome was total intravenous morphine equivalent analgesic consumption (including PCIA and rescue analgesia) at 0-48h and 24-48h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included modified NRS pain scores, Ramsay sedation scores, patient satisfaction scores, time to first ambulation, time to first flatus, hospital discharge time, and incidence of complications. Results: Fifty-seven patients were included in the final analysis. The total morphine equivalent consumption at 0-48h and 24-48h was significantly lower in the experimental group (30.12 mg and 13.14 mg, respectively) compared to the control group (38.62 mg and 16.72 mg, respectively) (p ≤ 0.05). The experimental group also had significantly lower modified NRS pain scores at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours postoperatively and higher patient satisfaction scores (p ≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences in sedation scores, complication rates, or recovery indices between the groups. Conclusion: A single ESPB with the cocktail formula solution significantly prolongs analgesia for up to 48 hours and provides superior analgesic efficacy compared to plain ropivacaine in patients undergoing laparoscopic major upper abdominal surgery, without increasing complications.

Indexed as

cocktail formula solutionerector spinae plane blockmajor upper abdominal surgerypostoperative analgesiarandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41868288
PMCPMC13005208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.