ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Antimicrobial resistance as a multicultural challenge: a decolonized approach to science communication in the Global South.
Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), or drug-resistant infection, is a serious threat to global well-being, impacting human, animal and environmental health, and is predicted to cause more deaths than cancer by 2050 (10 million deaths annually). AMR is often termed a super-wicked problem that prevents straightforward solutions due to the systemic, multi-sectoral and multifactorial issues underlying it, posing a dilemma for AMR communication in LMICs. Antimicrobial stewardship, which consists of coordinated efforts to optimize antimicrobial use to reduce AMR, and communication for antimicrobial stewardship behaviours, are hindered by many cultural factors: subjective norms, medical pluralism, hierarchical culture, etc. This Viewpoint suggests ways and examples for how a decolonized approach can support communication around a multicultural issue such as AMR, for understanding drivers and exploring locally relevant solutions. These include recognizing systemic barriers, social norms and collective values, challenging the universalism of Western science to value local knowledge and practices, promoting local ownership of intervention design and knowledge generation, adapting to local structural norms and hierarchies, and being aware of the language problem of AMR. It is imperative that locally contextualized capacity strengthening is available to empower Global South science communication actors (researchers, academics and practitioners).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.