Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868271›Full record

ArticleApplied sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effect of Subglottic Stenosis on Expiratory Sound Using Direct Noise Calculation.

Biao Geng, Qian Xue, Scott Thomson, Xudong Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Biao GengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
Qian XueDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8462-1271
Scott ThomsonDepartment of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Brigham Young University-Idaho, Rexburg, ID 83460, USA.
Xudong ZhengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.

Funding

Influence of subglottic anatomy on voice productionR01DC009616 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TANNER, KRISTINE MARIE · 2009 to 2022
$4.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subglottic stenosis (SGS) is a rare yet potentially life-threatening condition that requires prompt identification and treatment. One of the primary symptoms of SGS is a respiratory sound that is tonal. To better understand the effect of SGS on expiratory sound, we used direct noise calculation to simulate sound production in a simplified axisymmetric configuration that included the trachea, the vocal folds, the supraglottal tract, and an open environmental space. This study focused on flow-sustained tones and explored the impact of various parameters, such as the SGS severity, the SGS distance, the flowrate, and the glottal opening size. It was found that the sound pressure level (SPL) of the expiratory sound increased with flowrate. SGS had little effect on the sound until its severity approached 75% and SPL increased rapidly as the severity approached 100%. The results also revealed that the tonal components of the sound predominantly came from hole tones and tract harmonics and their coupling. The spectra of the sound were greatly influenced by constricting the glottis, which suggests that respiratory tasks that involve maneuvers to change the glottal opening size could be useful in gathering more information on respiratory sound to aid in the diagnosis of subglottic stenosis.

Indexed as

flow-sustained toneshole tonerespiratory soundsubglottic stenosiswhistle

Identifiers

PMID41868271
PMCPMC13001727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.