ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Acellular dermal matrix alone or in combination with subacromial bursa and humeral bone marrow concentrate for augmentation of massive rotator cuff tear repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial protocol (MODA).
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05855759 (Acellular Matrix Homologous From Human Dermis in Combination With Orthobiologic Stimuli,Subacromial Bursa and Humeral Bone Marrow Concentrate, for Augmentation of Massiverotator Cuff Tears), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Acellular Matrix Homologous From Human Dermis in Combination With Orthobiologic Stimuli,Subacromial Bursa and Humeral Bone Marrow Concentrate, for Augmentation of Massiverotator Cuff Tears: Therapeutic Efficacy and Improvements for the Development of a Costeffective and Ready to Use Product
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Massive rotator cuff tears are challenging injuries, and there is currently a clinical need to improve treatment outcomes and reduce the re-tear rate. In recent years, both mechanical augmentation with acellular matrices, such as acellular dermal matrix and orthobiologics, including concentrated humeral bone marrow or subacromial bursal tissue, have been proposed to enhance clinical outcomes of the rotator cuff repair. Methods: Seventy-two patients (aged 18-65 years) with repairable large to massive rotator cuff tears involving supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either acellular dermal matrix alone (Group A: mechanical augmentation) or a combination of acellular dermal matrix enriched with bone marrow concentrated from the humeral head and subacromial bursal tissue (Group B: mechanical and biological augmentation). The primary outcome is the re-tear rate at 1 year follow-up, assessed via MRI using Sugaya classification. Secondary outcomes include clinical and functional evaluations using the Constant-Murley, Visual Analogue Scale, PASS and DASH scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Work loss and restricted activity days and adverse events are also recorded. Biological and biomechanical characterization of acellular dermal matrix, concentrated humeral bone marrow and subacromial bursa are measured and correlated with clinical outcomes to find parameters affecting the tendon repair. Expected outcomes: A more robust tendon-to-bone reattachment, vascularization and cell colonization are expected to face to patient's functional demand and to diminish the psychological and economic burden resulting from re-tears, revisions, additional rehabilitation and missed work. The use of decellularized human matrix provides benefits, since it derives from donation of human tissue, with low production and distribution costs in comparison with commercially available acellular matrices. Clinical trial registration: [clinicaltrials.gov], identifier [NCT05855759].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.