Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2026
Efficacy and Safety of PHPV Fusion Factor Vaginal Gel (PHPV®) in Clearing Cervical Persistent High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PHPV in the treatment of persistent high-risk papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection of the cervix. Patients and Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted on patients with persistent hrHPV infection which were randomly assigned in three groups: PHPV, interferon and control. All participants were followed up at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after enrollment. The primary outcome was hrHPV clearance at 6 months post-enrollment. Secondary outcomes included effective rate, HPV E6/E7 mRNA negativity, changes in vaginal microecology and safety. The primary analysis was conducted on the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. Results: Of 842 patients screened, 120 were randomly assigned to three groups and 110 were included in the mITT analyses. At 3 months, hrHPV clearance rates were higher in both the PHPV and interferon groups compared with the control group. However, after covariate adjustment, the superiority over no treatment remained robust for PHPV, whereas the interferon vs control comparison showed attenuation. At 6 months, hrHPV clearance was 66.7% in the PHPV group, 45.9% in the interferon group, and 20.6% in the control group. Adjusted analyses showed that PHPV was significantly superior to no treatment (RR 2.81, 95% CI 1.37-5.79, Conclusion: PHPV is an effective and safe non-invasive therapeutic option for persistent hrHPV infection. Clinical Trial Registration: www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2200063608.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.