Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868140›Full record

ArticleGlobal surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education2026

Impact of case-specific learning goal on robotic-assisted surgery care delivery.

Michael Meara, Theresa Wang, Heidi Pieper, David Renton, Xiaodong Phoenix Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael MearaDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 395 W 12th Ave43210 USA.
Theresa WangDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 395 W 12th Ave43210 USA.
Heidi PieperDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 395 W 12th Ave43210 USA.
David RentonDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 395 W 12th Ave43210 USA.
Xiaodong Phoenix ChenDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 395 W 12th Ave43210 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6601-1528

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We hypothesize that resident's intraoperative case-specific learning goal may influence resident intraoperative autonomy and robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) surgical outcomes measured by operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), direct cost (DC), and 30-day readmission (30R). Methods: Valid resident operative performance evaluations, which includes case-specific learning goal selection (LGS) and degree of learning goal completion (LGC) metrics, of three outpatient RAS procedures-inguinal hernia, ventral hernia, and cholecystectomy-performed by PGY2-5 residents were collected. Cases in which residents served as bedside assistants were excluded. OT, LOS, DC, and 30R for matched cases were extracted from hospital records. Descriptive statistical analysis was applied. Results: A total of 104 evaluations from 57 outpatient RAS cases were analyzed. Residents' overall permitted intraoperative autonomy was positively correlated with their LGS (0.66, Conclusions: Study findings suggest the case-specific learning goal may influence resident autonomy as well as LOS, OT, DC and 30R of outpatient RAS cases. Identifying an achievable learning goal upon a resident's competency level may enhance intraoperative training and RAS care outcomes.

Indexed as

Learning goalResident trainingRobotic-assisted surgerySurgical education

Identifiers

PMID41868140
PMCPMC13002655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.