ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Effectiveness and safety of cemiplimab in locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal Analysis of Aggressive Multifocal Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Associated with a Germline COL6A3 Truncating Variant: A Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a common skin cancer with increasing incidence. The anti-PD-1 therapy cemiplimab has shown its antitumor activity in locally advanced (lacSCC) and metastatic cSCC (mcSCC). This retrospective study assessed the real-life effectiveness and safety of cemiplimab in 83 patients with lacSCC (n = 53) and mcSCC (n = 30). The objective response rate (ORR) was 49.4%, with a complete response (CR) in 15.7% and a partial response (PR) in 33.7%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14 months (95% CI 9-55) and the median overall survival (OS) 19 months (95% CI 10-39). Half of patients (50.6%) experienced adverse events (AE) of any grade, with 8.4% discontinuing therapy due to the severe AEs. The subset of patients who experienced progression during therapy displayed younger age (p = 0.002), a higher disease stage at baseline (p = 0.003), and a nodal disease (p = 0.041). No differences in survival outcome emerged between patients with nodal vs. distant metastases, previous radiotherapy recipient vs. radiotherapy-naïve, and immunosuppressed vs. immunocompetent patients. Head&neck tumor site was associated with a longer OS after first progression (OS2, HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.89). This study supports the safe and effective use of cemiplimab in real life clinical practice yet highlights the need for further identification of new predictors of clinical response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.