ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Effects of a custom forelimb prosthesis on weight distribution, stability, and gait in a canine amputee: A multi-method approach.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Customized 3D orthopedic exoprostheses for dogs with amputations and congenital malformations: a case series study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate whether the use of a custom prosthesis improves static stability and gait symmetry in a dog with a forelimb amputation. This study involved two therapy dogs owned by the same individual, both mixed breeds with similar physical characteristics. Dog with amputation had a full forelimb amputation and had been successfully using a prosthesis since 2022. Healthy dog served as a control in three different assessment methods evaluating prosthetic effectiveness. For static measurements, a four-scale method and a force plate were used; dynamic data were collected using a pressure-sensor mat. Dog with amputation distributed 21 % of its body weight onto the prosthesis, reducing the load on the contralateral limb from 49 % to 35 %. The total forelimb load increased from 49 % to 56 % with the prosthesis. Stabilometric analysis indicated improved stability with the prosthesis: significant reduction in sway path length, while changes in directional sway components and sway area were not statistically conclusive. Sensor-mat measurements on GAITRite showed that forelimb amputation substantially reduced step length (21.1 cm) and stride length (42.4 cm) on the amputated side, and increased traversal time to 2.4 s, reflecting pronounced gait asymmetry and impaired limb function. The use of a prosthesis improved step length (35.0 and 30.1 cm) and stride length (64.1 and 63.0 cm), and decreased traversal time to 2.2 s, indicating enhanced gait efficiency, although values did not fully reach those of the healthy dog (step length 46.8/44.6 cm; stride length 93.5/87.7 cm; time 1.5 s). These results demonstrate the functional benefits of prosthetic use in canine forelimb amputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.