Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41868084›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2026

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Intensive Care Unit Caregiver Distress Scale.

Usha Chivukula, Kirtideepa Subhadarsani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Usha ChivukulaDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Psychology, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6069-664X
Kirtideepa SubhadarsaniDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Psychology, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-729X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Family caregivers of intensive care unit (ICU) patients experience significant psychological distress; however, existing general caregiver measurement instruments fail to capture the unique stressors inherent to intensive care settings. This study aimed to develop a self-report instrument to measure psychological distress specific to ICU family caregivers, explore its core dimensional structure, and evaluate its psychometric properties. Patients and methods: The ICU Caregiver Distress Scale (ICU-CDS) was developed and validated in multiple phases, including item generation, content validation, and pilot testing. A sample of 313 family caregivers of ICU patients participated in the study. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to identify and confirm the scale's dimensional structure and psychometric properties. Results: The ICU-CDS demonstrated a clear multidimensional structure with a Cronbach's Conclusion: The ICU-CDS provides a robust, contextually sensitive measure of psychological distress among ICU family caregivers. By capturing specific stressors unique to the ICU setting, this scale addresses critical limitations of existing general caregiver instruments and can be utilized to assess distress among ICU patient family caregivers. How to cite this article: Chivukula U, Subhadarsani K. Development and Psychometric Validation of the Intensive Care Unit Caregiver Distress Scale. Indian J Crit Care Med 2026;30(2):128-133.

Indexed as

CaregiversConfirmatory factor analysisDistressExploratory factor analysisIntensive care unitScale development

Identifiers

PMID41868084
PMCPMC12999760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.