ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Investigation of Uterine Contractility and Myometrial Stiffness in Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition affecting women's quality of life. The pathophysiology of POP is complex and not yet fully understood. This study aimed to investigate uterine contractility and myometrial stiffness in patients with POP. Patient Methods: The study included 27 POP patients and 27 non-POP patients scheduled for hysterectomy. Preoperatively, transabdominal shear wave elastography (SWE) examinations were performed. During hysterectomy, myometrial tissues were collected and suspended in isolated organ baths. Peak-to-peak (p-p) contractions, the area under the curve (AUC), and frequency changes before and after oxytocin application were normalized as percentage changes between the two groups. Results: No significant differences were observed in SWE measurements between the groups. When uterine contraction measurements were compared after oxytocin administration, frequency, p-p, and AUC values were statistically significantly reduced in the POP group compared to the non-POP group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: An association was observed between decreased uterine contractility and POP. The results obtained in the present study suggest that decreased uterine contractility may be a risk factor for the development of POP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.