ArticleAdvances in physics: X2025
Modeling biomolecular condensates across scales: Atomistic, coarse-grained, and data-driven approaches.
Article in Advances in physics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Valency-Limited Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Stickers-and-Spacers Polymers Reveal a Tradeoff Between Condensation and Organization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Molecular Origins of pH Gradients in Charge-Regulated Biomolecular Condensates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Condensates as Conformation Editors of Disordered Client Proteins.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Intrinsic Disorder as a Biomimetic Design Paradigm.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomolecular condensates are integral to processes underlying cellular function and dysfunction, and they also present a versatile platform for engineering living cells. Understanding how molecular interactions give rise to condensate form and function is therefore a major area of research. Computational modeling has emerged as a powerful tool for uncovering the biophysical principles underlying condensates. Because condensate biophysics spans multiple spatiotemporal scales, from interactions of amino acid side chains to the emergent material properties of entire condensates, decoding their behavior requires multiscale strategies. In this review, we discuss three core classes of computational modeling approaches that extend our ability to probe condensates. We first examine atomistic modeling, which enables a detailed examination of interactions that encode condensate behaviors. We then discuss coarse-grained modeling, with a focus on residue-resolution models, which advance our ability to predict condensate properties with both precision and efficiency. Finally, we summarize advances in data-driven and machine learning approaches, which leverage molecular simulations to map sequence-property relationships of condensates at a fraction of the cost. Throughout the review, we highlight the key ingredients of each approach, the types of simulations and modeling strategies employed, and the primary observables that can be measured. In doing so, we aim for this review to serve as both an informative and practical guide for leveraging these approaches to understand and engineer biomolecular condensates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.