ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Self-reported patient experiences in a peer-support community: What do cancer patients value?
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Using unguided podcast narratives offers a unique and original opportunity to access patient experiences and understand what patient's value in their care journey in developing true patient-centered oncology models. Online health communities contain a wealth of information, including unsolicited patient experiences that may go beyond what is captured by guided surveys or patient-reported outcome instruments. This study describes patient experiences reported in a peer support community to gain insight into what patients share amongst each other and what they value. Methods: A purposive sample of 31 unguided, French-speaking self-reported patient narratives were collected from the podcast "Naitre princesse, devenir guerrière" registered between 2021 and 2024. Episodes included patient ( Results: From patient narratives, six core themes of patient value emerged: (peer) support, empowerment, relationship with healthcare professionals, quality of life, cancer as an opportunity, and individuality. Narratives underscored patient value as rooted in reclaiming agency, redefining life priorities, and engaging in meaningful action. Participants revealed the irreplaceable role of peers in providing mutual understanding and solidarity, alongside ambivalent but pivotal relationships with healthcare professionals. Conclusion: Self-reported narratives from peer communities offer empirical evidence into patients' priorities and lived realities, revealing what patients identify as meaningful in their cancer pathways. These findings accentuate the importance of transdisciplinary analysis of patient experiences beyond clinical outcomes and physician reports. Online health communities represent a promising but underexplored arena for understanding and integrating patient values into care, research, and policy. Future research should further examine their role in shaping participatory and value-driven health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.