ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Enhancing deep learning in AI-enhanced education: a dual mediation model of cognitive load and learning motivation through interaction quality.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning-centred use of generative AI and later academic functioning: a baseline-adjusted three-wave panel study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The critical-thinking paradox in generative AI-integrated learning: distinguishing efficiency from cognitive depth-a differentiated framework and testable propositions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Bayesian cognitive diagnosis optimizes personalized learning paths via mediation of cognitive load and Hidden Markov Model state transitions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research develops and validates a dual mediation framework examining the pathways through which interaction quality in artificial intelligence educational systems is positively associated with deep learning outcomes via cognitive load reduction and motivational enhancement. Utilizing covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM), we analyzed survey data from 570 university teachers engaged with AI-powered learning platforms. Findings demonstrate that high-quality human-AI interaction significantly reduces cognitive burden, which in turn is positively related to learning motivation and shows pathways to deep learning approaches. Bootstrap procedures confirmed robust sequential mediation effects, with this pathway accounting for 53% of the total variance. The model achieved excellent fit indices and explained 31.5% of variance in deep learning outcomes. By synthesizing Cognitive Load Theory with Self-Determination Theory, this study contributes to educational technology scholarship by elucidating the psychological mechanisms linking interface design to learning depth. The empirical evidence provides actionable insights for developing AI educational systems that strategically minimize cognitive demands, foster motivational engagement, and support meaningful learning experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.