ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Deep learning-based classification of student GPA integrating psychological and family factors in the post-pandemic era.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of artificial intelligence with multi-head self-attention based deep learning model for students' academic performance monitoring.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the post-pandemic era, college students' academic performance is influenced by a range of non-cognitive factors, which often reduces the accuracy of conventional Grade Point Average (GPA) prediction models. For this, we developed a deep-learning-based GPA classification framework that integrates family background and psychological evaluation indicators, and empirically revealed the underlying associations among these dimensions. Methods: Data were collected from 1,692 undergraduates at a Chinese university. The dataset included family background factors such as gender, family economic situation, only-child, and left-behind years, as well as SCL-90 psychological evaluation scores and GPA records. Four deep learning models were evaluated: TabTransformer, DCNv2, AutoInt, and MLP-ResNet. In addition, a lightweight feature-gating mechanism was incorporated to improve feature selection in high-dimensional heterogeneous data. Model performance was evaluated using Accuracy and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC). Associations among variables were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation, Results: The TabTransformer with the gating mechanism achieved the highest performance among the tested models, with an Accuracy of 0.798 and an AUC of 0.833. GPA was significantly negatively correlated with SCL-90 domains, including depression and anxiety. Additionally, unfavorable family background factors-such as lower family economic status and longer periods of being left behind-were correlated with poorer psychological assessment outcomes. Conclusion: This study developed a deep-learning framework using family background and psychological evaluation factors to classify GPA, support academic risk identification, and inform targeted academic assistance and psychological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.