ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2026
Evaluating the QEAS-7 questionnaire as a predictor of asbestos burden in lung tissue among lung cancer patients: insights from the AMCANES study.
Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Asbestos exposure is a known risk factor for lung cancer, and quantifying asbestos bodies (ABs) in lung tissue remains the gold standard for assessing cumulative exposure. However, histological analysis is not routinely available in many clinical settings. The validated QEAS-7 questionnaire was developed to evaluate occupational, domestic, and environmental asbestos exposure. This study examined the association between QEAS-7 exposure classifications and the asbestos burden in lung cancer patients. Methods: A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted across nine Spanish hospitals. Patients with histologically confirmed lung cancer undergoing surgical resection completed the QEAS-7 questionnaire. Non-tumoral lung tissue samples were analyzed for Abs and asbestos burden was categorized according to AB concentration (with elevated burden defined as >1000 AB/g). Diagnostic performance metrics were evaluated. Results: Among 133 patients (median age 67 years; 77% male), ABs were detected in 61% of samples, with 5% showing an elevated asbestos burden (>1000 AB/g). Occupational exposure was reported by 36% of patients and accounted for 71.4% of cases with elevated burden. Domestic exposure was reported by 9% of patients and detected in 28.6% of elevated-burden cases. The combined occupational and domestic exposure domain achieved 100% sensitivity for detecting elevated asbestos burden, while occupational and domestic domains alone showed sensitivities of 71.4% and 28.6%, respectively. Specificity and positive predictive values remained modest. Notably, 29% of patients classified as 'non-exposed' by QEAS-7 had measurable ABs. Conclusion: The QEAS-7 questionnaire demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting elevated asbestos burden when combining occupational and domestic exposures. While histological analysis remains the definitive method, QEAS-7 offers a practical screening alternative, when lacking access to tissue-based diagnostics or occupational hygiene expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.