ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Effect of patient clothing removal with scissors on time to defibrillation by lay rescuers: a randomized controlled simulation trial.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated external defibrillator cabinets without scissors: a hidden barrier to effective resuscitation.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Reply to "Automated external defibrillator cabinets without scissors: a hidden barrier to effective resuscitation".Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early defibrillation using an automated external defibrillator (AED) is a key determinant of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the impact of clothing removal strategies on time to defibrillation and AED pad placement accuracy remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled simulation trial involving 40 undergraduate students without healthcare provider-level resuscitation training. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the scissors or no-scissors group during a simulated OHCA scenario using a clothed manikin. The primary outcome was time from AED power-on to shock delivery. The secondary outcome was AED pad placement accuracy evaluated using standardized anatomical criteria. Results: The median time from AED power-on to shock delivery was longer in the scissors group than in the no-scissors group (118 vs 91.5 s; Hodges-Lehmann median difference 24 s, 95% CI 6-39; Conclusions: In this randomized controlled simulation trial, the use of scissors for clothing removal was associated with a longer time from AED power-on to shock delivery, without improvement in pad placement accuracy. These findings do not support routine scissor use under the simulated conditions. Larger studies are needed to determine the role of clothing removal strategies in AED training for lay rescuers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.