ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Medical Students' Perspectives on Inclusivity Within Clinical Environments: A Pilot Study.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Limited resources including staff, technology, and space in United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) environments present challenges for working teaching and learning. Cumulative pressures impact mental health and prompt medical students to question career choices, leave the profession, or emigrate. There is little understanding of the experience of inclusivity in clinical environments for medical students. This pilot study explores students' perspectives of these environments, the barriers to formulating change, and possible solutions. Materials and Methods: Six diverse clinical medical students from the University of Manchester, based at a single NHS Trust, voluntarily participated in one of four recorded focus groups facilitated by a near-peer with protected characteristics. Low participation emphasised the importance of undertaking this pilot study to consider methods for future study design. Transcriptions were independently analysed by two reviewers to generate themes using NVivo. Results: Key themes included positive experiences with resident doctors; negative interactions with patients; negative attitudes and poor role modelling from some staff; perceived lack of institutional support; and poor learning opportunities. Students suggested staff training and better support structures to improve learning environments. Conclusion: This study highlights universal issues from the perspectives of minoritised students and emphasises their low participation in research. Authors suggest exploring clinical faculty support and training to improve learning environments, and innovations in study design for wider, more democratic and culturally sensitive participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.