Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867884›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026

Medical Students' Perspectives on Inclusivity Within Clinical Environments: A Pilot Study.

Enam Haque, Jacqueline M Lavin, Rebecca Farrington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enam HaqueSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8530-5027
Jacqueline M LavinNorthern Care Alliance Foundation Trust, Salford, NHS, UK.
Rebecca FarringtonEdge Hill Medical School, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Limited resources including staff, technology, and space in United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) environments present challenges for working teaching and learning. Cumulative pressures impact mental health and prompt medical students to question career choices, leave the profession, or emigrate. There is little understanding of the experience of inclusivity in clinical environments for medical students. This pilot study explores students' perspectives of these environments, the barriers to formulating change, and possible solutions. Materials and Methods: Six diverse clinical medical students from the University of Manchester, based at a single NHS Trust, voluntarily participated in one of four recorded focus groups facilitated by a near-peer with protected characteristics. Low participation emphasised the importance of undertaking this pilot study to consider methods for future study design. Transcriptions were independently analysed by two reviewers to generate themes using NVivo. Results: Key themes included positive experiences with resident doctors; negative interactions with patients; negative attitudes and poor role modelling from some staff; perceived lack of institutional support; and poor learning opportunities. Students suggested staff training and better support structures to improve learning environments. Conclusion: This study highlights universal issues from the perspectives of minoritised students and emphasises their low participation in research. Authors suggest exploring clinical faculty support and training to improve learning environments, and innovations in study design for wider, more democratic and culturally sensitive participation.

Indexed as

diversityequalityinclusioninclusivitylearning environmentmedical schoolmedical studentstudent experience

Identifiers

PMID41867884
PMCPMC13003977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.