ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Perceptions from a Single Virtual Near-Peer Mock SBA Examination: A Retrospective Pre-Post Study Among Undergraduate Medical Students.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Formative mock examinations are increasingly used to help medical students transition from theoretical learning to clinical application. Delivering such assessments through virtual near-peer formats may enhance accessibility and engagement, yet evidence remains limited regarding student perceptions and confidence outcomes. Methods: A single live virtual near-peer mock single-best-answer (SBA) examination was conducted in March 2023 using an interactive polling platform. Senior medical students developed 30 SBA questions aligned with the UK Medical Licensing Assessment content map. Participants completed a post-session questionnaire containing retrospective pre- and post-ratings of confidence and anxiety, and items assessing perceived preparedness, question difficulty, time allocation, and platform usability. Data were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Pearson's chi-squared test. Results: A total of 198 students participated, with 82.8% from Cardiff University. Median self-reported confidence for sitting final examinations increased from 5 (IQR 4-6) to 6 (IQR 4-7) (p < 0.001), while anxiety remained unchanged at 8 (IQR 6-9) (p = 0.054). Participants rated the mock as moderately beneficial for exam preparation (median 5 [IQR 4-6]) and judged the 90-second question limit appropriate (median 8 [IQR 7-10]). Most respondents (65.7%) preferred the live-polling platform for future mock assessments. Conclusion: A single virtual near-peer mock SBA examination was feasible and well received, and was associated with a small but measurable gain in students' self-reported confidence without a change in anxiety. These findings highlight the value of virtual near-peer formats as accessible formative tools within undergraduate medical education. However, the generalisability of results should be interpreted cautiously given the retrospective pre-post design and sampling concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.