ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Base-pair scale dynamics of a repair helicase on DNA lesions reveal varied damage-sensing mechanisms.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a cellular pathway that removes DNA lesions caused by ultraviolet light and various mutagens. A critical component of the NER machinery is XPD helicase, which unwinds the duplex around the damage, allowing its excision and repair. XPD has also been increasingly implicated in sensing and verifying DNA damage. However, the detailed mechanisms by which XPD responds to DNA damage have to-date remained unclear. Here, we use optical tweezers to perform real-time, high-precision measurements of single molecules of XPD as they encounter a variety of well-defined DNA modifications, including a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD), a natural substrate for NER. The observed XPD dynamics reveal different behaviors depending on the damage type and the relative orientations of the DNA fork, damage, and helicase. Most notably, XPD displays an almost complete inability to unwind past a CPD on the translocated strand, and instead exhibits a short pause around the lesion-though not a stall-followed by retreat. Combining the base pair-scale XPD kinetics with structural analyses, we identify two regions of XPD sensitive to DNA modifications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.