ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Matrix viscoelasticity regulates dermal fibroblast activation in a three-dimensional fibrillar microenvironment.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Fibrosis is the pathological remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) that is largely orchestrated by activated fibroblasts. The mechanical properties of the ECM change drastically during fibrosis, and fibroblasts become increasingly activated by mechanical environments that mimic the properties of fibrotic tissues. While the effects of increased elastic modulus (stiffness) on fibroblast activation have been well-studied, the impact of changes in viscoelasticity are less clear. Here, we sought to determine how fibroblast activation is altered by changes in viscoelasticity in a three-dimensional, fibrillar microenvironment. Methods: We employed 3D alginate collagen I hydrogels with independently tunable stiffness and stress relaxation rates. Dermal fibroblasts were encapsulated in hydrogels with four distinct mechanical profiles (soft: 3 kPa or stiff: 10 kPa, fast stress relaxing: τ Results: Fibrillar alginate collagen networks enhanced fibroblast spreading, α-smooth muscle actin stress fiber formation, and fibroblast activation protein-α expression in matrices that were slow relaxing or stiff. The presence of the fibrillar network further enhanced fibroblast activation, independent of the changes driven by matrix viscoelasticity. ECM remodeling was also promoted by slow relaxing matrices, with increased fibronectin deposition and more remodeling of the local collagen fiber network. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that fibroblast activation is highly responsive to matrix stress relaxation rate, and that models incorporating fibrillar, viscoelastic networks can provide new insights into the role of ECM mechanics driving fibroblast activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.