ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Grounding olfactory perception in language: Benchmarks and models for generating natural language odor descriptions.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in deep learning have enabled prediction of odorant perception from molecular structure, opening new avenues for odor classification. However, most existing models are limited to predicting percepts from fixed vocabularies and fail to capture the full richness of olfactory experience. Progress is further limited by the scarcity of large-scale olfactory datasets and the lack of standardized metrics for evaluating free-form natural-language odor descriptions. To address these challenges, we introduce Odor Description and Inference Evaluation Understudy (ODIEU), a benchmark which includes perceptual descriptions of over 10,000 molecules paired with a model-based metric for evaluating free-form odor text descriptions. The model-based metric uses Sentence-BERT (SBERT) models which are fine-tuned on olfactory descriptions to allow better evaluation of human-generated odor texts. Using the fine-tuned SBERT models, we show that free-form text odor descriptions contain additional perceptual information in their syntactic structure compared to semantic labels. We further introduce CIRANO (Chemical Information Recognition and Annotation Network for Odors), a transformer-based model that generates free-form odor descriptions directly from molecular structure, thus implementing the molecular structure-to-text (S2T) prediction. CIRANO achieves performance comparable to humans. Finally, we generate human-like descriptions from mouse olfactory bulb neural data using an invertible SBERT model, yielding neural-to-text (N2T) predictions highly aligned with human descriptions. Together, CIRANO and ODIEU establish a standardized framework for generating natural language olfactory descriptions and evaluating their alignment with human perception. Code is available at https://github.com/KoulakovLab/ODIEU.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.