Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867752›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Comprehensive Mapping of Immune Nanobody Repertoires with NanoMAP.

William L White, Edward Moseley, Jacqueline M Tremblay, Jackson Reilly, Akram A Da'dara, Patrick J Skelly, Lenore J Cowen, Charles B Shoemaker

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William L WhiteDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.ORCID 0009-0004-0041-2125
Edward MoseleyDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
Jacqueline M TremblayDepartment of Infectious Disease and Global Health, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA 01536.
Jackson ReillyDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
Akram A Da'daraDepartment of Infectious Disease and Global Health, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA 01536.
Patrick J SkellyDepartment of Infectious Disease and Global Health, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA 01536.
Lenore J CowenDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
Charles B ShoemakerDepartment of Infectious Disease and Global Health, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA 01536.ORCID 0000-0001-9738-1361

Funding

Tufts IRACDAK12GM133314 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI CLAIRE L MOORE, Jamie Lynn Maguire · 2019 to 2026
$8.4M
Molecular mechanisms of botulinum neurotoxin neutralizationR01AI125704 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JIN, RONGSHENG, SHOEMAKER, CHARLES BIX · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125704NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM133314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanobodies have recently emerged as alternatives to classical antibodies in therapeutic and diagnostic contexts from parasites to bacteria to viruses, promising improved stability and simpler manufacturing. To improve nanobody discovery efficiency, we developed an integrated experimental and computational pipeline for detailed characterization of the target binding properties of complete alpaca immune repertoires using our custom Nanobody Meta-clustering Analysis Platform (NanoMAP). We tested our pipeline on three distinct pools of targets, immunizing two alpacas with each pool and generating cDNA and phage display libraries from their immune repertoires. We then panned the phage libraries on each target. To produce more detailed binding information, we performed panning variations using subunits, natural variants, intact pathogens, and binding site competitors. Deep sequencing reads from nanobody libraries before and after each panning were pooled and analyzed with NanoMAP to identify nanobody clonal families and assess their levels of enrichment from the library in each panning, reflecting their affinities. NanoMAP outperformed standard clustering methods, producing clonal families that are coherent in sequence and function and detecting rare but high affinity families. By aggregating sequencing data within clonal families, NanoMAP produced reliable and rich data on nanobody repertoire binding phenotypes for each antigen, enhancing nanobody discovery capabilities.

Identifiers

PMID41867752
PMCPMC13001438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.