Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867719›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Arm Control and its Recovery after Selective Lesions of Sensorimotor Cortex and the Red Nucleus: A Kinematic Study in Non-Human Primates.

Anna Baines, Annie Poll, Anne M E Baker, John W Krakauer, Stuart N Baker

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna BainesFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-6651-7248
Annie PollFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-6459-8897
Anne M E BakerFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4573-4596
John W KrakauerDepartments of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4316-1846
Stuart N BakerFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8118-4048

Funding

Locating the neural substrates for the flexor synergy after strokeR01NS119319 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE · PI BAKER, STUART N, KRAKAUER, JOHN WALTER · 2021 to 2025
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS119319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical and subcortical lesions to the motor system, as often occur with stroke, typically lead to transitions through a stereotyped upper limb recovery sequence. After initial weakness and loss of dexterity, spasticity and fixed muscle coactivation patterns (synergies) appear. Early work suggested that different features arise from distinct primary motor cortex (M1) subdivisions. Here we investigated this with modern methods, using ischemic lesions of various cortical areas and electrocoagulation lesions of magnocellular red nucleus (RNm) in rhesus monkeys. Nine animals were trained on a reach and grasp task; hand kinematics were assessed with markerless tracking. The proportion of damaged cortical layer V cells in each cortical area was quantified, and corresponding kinematic effects evaluated. Reaching speed showed greater and more persistent reductions with larger lesions to the posterior part of M1 on the gyrus (Posterior Old M1 in Strick's terminology). Initial increases in trajectory variability were more consistent with greater damage within the central sulcus (New M1); these partially recovered. Lesions involving Anterior Old M1 (Area 4s in Hines' terminology) had no additive negative effects. An extensive cortical lesion, which combined New and Old M1 with pre-motor and somatosensory cortex damage did not produce a worse or more persistent deficit than lesions limited to M1, suggesting that loss of arm control arose mainly from damage to descending pathways rather than cortico-cortical interactions. Lesions of RNm led to long-lasting slowing of reach, but no increase in variability. Subsequent cortical lesions to Old M1 led to more severe effects, and worse recovery, than without the preceding RNm lesion. This suggests an important neural compensatory role for the rubrospinal tract following cortical damage in monkey, which is not available in humans where the rubrospinal tract is vestigial. None of the lesions investigated led to overt abnormal synergies. The results are consistent with known differences in descending connections from each area: New M1 has fast cortico-motoneuronal output, known to be important for fine motor control (here assessed by trajectory variability); Old M1 has cortico-reticular connections able to activate the reticulospinal tract, important for generating the high forces needed for fast movements.

Identifiers

PMID41867719
PMCPMC13001405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.