ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2026
Establishment and Validation of Machine Learning Model for Predicting Suicide Risk in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suicide, a serious outcome in major depressive disorder (MDD), necessitates early risk detection for clinical intervention. This study developed machine learning models to predict suicide risk in MDD patients.The model incorporated both psychological (eg,the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale[HAMA], the Clinical Global Impression of Severity Scale [CGI-S]) and biological (eg, thyroid-stimulating hormone [TSH], Systolic blood pressure[SBP]) predictors, with CGI-S, HAMA, and SBP emerging as the top predictors. Patients and Methods: We analyzed data from 1,718 first-episode medicated patients with MDD recruited from the psychiatric outpatient department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (March 2016-June 2017). Feature selection was performed using Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and the importance of the selected features was ranked using SHAP values via the XGBoost algorithm. The features were incrementally incorporated into the model construction based on their importance. Eleven machine-learning algorithms were evaluated, and an optimized stacked ensemble model was developed using a stacking algorithm. Model performance was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, precision-recall (PR) curves, accuracy, recall, and F1 scores. Interpretability was enhanced using kernel-SHAP and LIME algorithms. Results: The Cohort comprised 1,718 MDD patients (mean age 34.87 ± 12.43 years; 34.20% male). Eight key predictors were selected: CGI-S score, HAMA score, TSH, SBP, PANSS positive subscale score, Antithyroglobulin, Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and age. The top predictors, included CGI-S, HAMA, and SBP, aligning with pathways involving autonomic dysregulation and anxiety-depression interplay. The stacked ensemble model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an Area Under Curve of 0.868 and a PR value of 0.665 on the test set, outperforming all the other models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed its clinical utility, showing the highest net benefit across a risk threshold range of 0.03-0.88. The SHAP method improved model interpretability and highlighted influential predictors. Conclusion: The stacked ensemble model exhibited a strong predictive performance and clinical applicability for suicide risk assessment in patients with MDD. This tool may aid clinicians in the early identification and intervention of high-risk individuals and potentially improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.