Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867661›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

Desiderata for a biomedical knowledge network: opportunities, challenges and future directions.

Chunlei Wu, Hongfang Liu, Jason Flannick, Mark A Musen, Andrew I Su, Lawrence E Hunter, Thomas M Powers, Cathy H Wu

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chunlei WuDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2629-6124
Hongfang LiuThe McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2570-3741
Jason FlannickPrograms in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3618-795X
Mark A MusenCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-793X
Andrew I SuDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9859-4104
Lawrence E HunterDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1455-3370
Thomas M PowersDepartment of Philosophy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2484-4721
Cathy H WuDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6379-8601

Funding

UniProt Partnerships with Common Fund Data Ecosystem Resources for Protein-Centric Functional GenomicsU24OD038424 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI WU, CATHY H. · 2024 to 2025
$2.0M
NIH HHS U24 OD038424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Knowledge graphs (KGs), collectively as a knowledge network, have become critical tools for knowledge discovery in computable and explainable knowledge systems. Due to the semantic and structural complexities of biomedical data, these KGs need to enable dynamic reasoning over large evolving graphs and support fit-for-purpose abstraction. Crucially, this requires establishing standards, preserving provenance and enforcing policy constraints for actionable discovery. Results: A recent meeting of leading scientists discussed the opportunities, challenges, and future directions of a biomedical knowledge network. Here we present six desiderata inspired by the meeting: (i) inference and reasoning in biomedical KGs need domain-centric approaches, (ii) harmonized and accessible standards are required for knowledge graph representation and metadata, (iii) robust validation of biomedical KGs needs multilayered, context-aware approaches that are both rigorous and scalable, (iv) the evolving and synergistic relationship between KGs and large language models is essential in empowering AI-driven biomedical discovery, (v) integrated development environments, public repositories, and governance frameworks are essential for secure and reproducible knowledge graph sharing, and (vi) robust validation, provenance, and ethical governance are critical for trustworthy biomedical KGs. Addressing these key issues will be essential to realize the promises of a biomedical knowledge network in advancing biomedicine.

Identifiers

PMID41867661
PMCPMC13004217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.