ReviewiScience2026
Advocating the potential of artificial intelligence for syndrome discovery in syndromic surveillance systems: A scoping review.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Open Syndrome Definition as a Machine-Readable Standard for Public Health: Design and Implementation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Advocating the potential of artificial intelligence for syndrome discovery in syndromic surveillance systems: A scoping review.iScience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Syndromic surveillance systems monitor and detect diseases in real time using existing public health data, with syndromes-sets of clinical characteristics-being central to these systems. However, defining these syndromes is a complex and time-consuming task that requires a high level of expertise and the analysis of large, often multimodal and high-dimensional datasets. This challenge is exacerbated by the emergence of new diseases, e.g., due to climate change, urbanization, or globalization. Artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize the process of syndrome definition in syndromic surveillance. A scoping review following the PRISMA extension guidelines was conducted to examine the role of artificial intelligence in this field. The PubMed, Google Scholar, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, ConnectedPapers, Web of Science, and Embase databases were reviewed. The initial search yielded 2,228 references. After removing duplicates and references outside the scope of the review, 15 studies were included. Most current solutions focus on known syndromes through supervised machine learning, primarily using English free-text data. Artificial intelligence offers immense potential, particularly through open science practices in machine learning, which can accelerate adoption and improve outcomes. However, significant challenges remain to fully realize these benefits. The review concludes with eight strategic recommendations for advancing AI-assisted syndrome discovery in public health. These recommendations address methodology, data handling, collaboration, and standardization to promote effectiveness and global applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.