ArticleACS omega2026
Mechanical Recyclability of TPS/PVA Blends and Their Comparison with Other Bioplastics.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thermoplastic starch-PVA blends currently present great potential since they show stable mechanical performance along with the advantage of compostability and self-biodegradability in the marine environment. However, one step further could be attained if this ocean-friendly compound could be mechanically recycled and then promote circular economy applications before its final composting. The main goal of this work is to study, for the first time, the mechanical recyclability of TPS/PVA compounds up to ten cycles, using blends based on potato, wheat, and cassava starch. Furthermore, the results are compared to those obtained by reprocessing commercial PLA and PHB compounds. As the mechanical reprocessing cycles proceed, all TPS/PVA compounds retain the mechanical performance after ten cycles, and especially toughness is also maintained. At the same time, there is evidence of some chain scission in starch, observed in earlier cycles for cassava-based compounds, although it is ultimately superior in a potato mixture. Interestingly, the starch syneresis progress as well as some chain scission allows a stable melt-flow index, up to cycle 10. In addition, wheat compounds could have the highest recycling potential, with less chain scission and syneresis, being able to redistribute the plasticizer in the starch-rich phase, improving its plasticization. Regarding commercial biopolymers, PLA loses toughness dramatically from cycle 4 and PHB from cycle 1, and the melt-flow index increases sharply, denoting a significant polymer degradation and poor recyclability potential.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.