Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867555›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Tuning Hydrogen versus Methane Production on Sustainable Biochar-Based Cathodes in Microbial Electrolysis Cells by Voltage Control.

Gabriele Soggia, Andrea Goglio, Elisa Clagnan, Tommy Pepè Sciarria, Barbara Mecheri, Alessandra D'Epifanio, Jillian L Goldfarb, Piergiorgio Stevanato, Pierangela Cristiani, Fabrizio Adani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabriele SoggiaGruppo Ricicla Lab., Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, Milan 20133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2280-5179
Andrea GoglioGruppo Ricicla Lab., Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, Milan 20133, Italy.
Elisa ClagnanGruppo Ricicla Lab., Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, Milan 20133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-5429
Tommy Pepè SciarriaGruppo Ricicla Lab., Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, Milan 20133, Italy.
Barbara MecheriDepartment of Chemical Science and Technologies, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, Rome 00133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1458-6239
Alessandra D'EpifanioDepartment of Chemical Science and Technologies, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, Rome 00133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4257-7399
Jillian L GoldfarbSmith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-9714
Piergiorgio StevanatoDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro 35020, Italy.
Pierangela CristianiRSE - Ricerca sul Sistema Energetico S.p.A., Via Rubattino 54, Milano 20134, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6315-9690
Fabrizio AdaniGruppo Ricicla Lab., Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, Milan 20133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0250-730X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the intermittency of solar and wind energy generation, efficient energy storage solutions are essential to ensure a global transition to renewable energy sources. Bioelectrochemical Power-to-Hydrogen systems are a promising storage pathway, yet their development is limited by high costs and low productivity compared to conventional hydrogen production. Novel, sustainable, and cost-effective materials, such as carbon-based electrodes, can help to overcome these challenges. This study evaluates five cathodes for hydrogen and methane production in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) operated at 600 and 800 mV: stainless steel mesh (SSM), two custom-made biochars derived from olive mill waste (OMW-1, OMW-2), and two commercial carbon-based materials (Carbon Black and Black Pearls). OMW-1 achieved a H

Identifiers

PMID41867555
PMCPMC13000772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.