ReviewACS omega2026
Review on Main Controlling Factors and Key Simulation Techniques of Hydro-Fracturing Potential for Coalbed Methane Reservoirs: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Prospects.
Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study on the hydraulic fracturing potential of coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs aims to assess the ability of coal seams to increase permeability and gas well productivity under the action of hydraulic fracturing. It provides a theoretical basis and technical support for optimizing reservoir fracturing design and improving the efficiency of CBM development, thereby addressing the issue of unstable production enhancement effects of the reservoirs. This review analyzes the primary factors influencing the hydro-fracturing potential of CBM reservoirs, taking into account both geological conditions and mechanical characteristics, and discusses the key physical and numerical simulation techniques for stimulating CBM reservoirs. Physical simulation techniques mainly focus on pore-fracture structure characterization, rock mechanics testing, logging interpretation, and injection falloff testing in the well. Numerical simulation technologies mainly focus on geomechanics simulation, digital core simulation, fracture propagation simulation, and fracturing operation simulation. There are many problems in the current research. The results of indoor tests differ significantly from the field application effects. The calculation accuracy of the evaluation parameters for the hydro-fracturing potential of CBM reservoirs is low. The construction of digital models is influenced by mathematical statistical methods, leading to the fallacy of equivalent cognition. The prediction of the fracturing improvement effect of CBM reservoirs faces systematic deviations in engineering applications. There is a lack of a comprehensive evaluation system that covers the coordination of multienergy systems, as well as environmental and economic factors. The analysis suggests that the breakthrough paths for future research should focus on the following aspects. Improve the physical compatibility between the experimental conditions and the actual reservoir environment. Innovate modeling methods that integrate geological measurement mechanisms and data-driven approaches. Establish a dynamic simulation system that covers the evolution of multi-scale fractures and the coupling of stress. Construct a multi-source dynamic evaluation system that integrates the goals of energy integration systems, environmental constraints, and economic benefits. This is to establish a geological-engineering collaborative research framework covering the entire time and space domain, thereby promoting the precise and efficient transformation of reservoirs and the efficient development of CBM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.