ArticleBlood neoplasia2026
Impact of age on outcomes after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphomas.
Article in Blood neoplasia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age may influence clinical outcomes after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Real-world data on the survival and toxicity outcomes of older patients receiving CAR-T therapy are limited. We used data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research for adults with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who received CAR-T therapy from May 2018 to June 2020. Cumulative incidence and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were reported. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed using age as a continuous variable and among 4 age groups: 18 to 54, 55 to 64, 65 to 74, and ≥75 years. Nearly half (44%) of 1916 total recipients were aged ≥65 years. Patients received either axicabtagene ciloleucel (75%) or tisagenlecleucel (25%). Overall rates of CRS and ICANS were 75% and 43%, and severe rates of CRS and ICANS were 9% and 21%, respectively. For all patients, 12-month overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and relapse rates were 62%, 42%, and 55%, respectively. As a continuous variable, older age did not affect OS, PFS, and CRS; however, the risk of ICANS increased with age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03;
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.