ReviewJournal of inflammation research2026
Biological Therapies for Urate Lowering and Inflammation Control in Gout Management.
Review in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gout remains the most prevalent inflammatory arthritis worldwide, driven by hyperuricemia and monosodium urate crystal-induced inflammation. Conventional therapies manage most patients effectively, but refractory disease and contraindications in special populations create unmet clinical needs. This gap is particularly evident among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease or organ transplants. Biologic therapies targeting key pathophysiologic mechanisms have emerged as specialized options for these difficult-to-treat cases. Pegloticase achieves sustained urate reduction in refractory gout. Concomitant immunomodulatory therapy using methotrexate or mycophenolate substantially improves response rates by mitigating antidrug antibody formation. Anti-inflammatory biologics targeting the interleukin-1 (IL-1) pathway underwent a prolonged clinical translation process. Anakinra accumulated extensive off-label evidence over two decades without formal approval, while rilonacept faced regulatory rejection in 2012 despite demonstrating efficacy. Canakinumab received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in August 2023 after its initial rejection in 2011, becoming the first biologic formally indicated for gout in the United States. NLR family pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome inhibitors represent a recent area of investigation. OLT1177 has advanced through clinical development after incorporating safety lessons from the hepatotoxicity experience associated with MCC950. Diverse pipeline compounds further reflect active research in this therapeutic class. Biologics function as rescue options for patients with inadequate responses to conventional treatment rather than as first-line alternatives. Remaining challenges include immunogenicity management, treatment costs that limit accessibility, and incomplete long-term safety characterization. Future progress depends on refining patient selection through predictive biomarkers and ensuring appropriate access for patients most likely to benefit from these advances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.