ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
The Readiness Among Nutrition Support Hospital Staff for the Implementation of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To timely tackle malnutrition in hospital patients, the implementation of a new malnutrition practice is needed. We aimed to determine the readiness of nutrition support hospital staff for implementing a new malnutrition practice, using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) instrument. Participants and Methods: A cross-sectional assessment of readiness among nutrition support hospital staff was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were scored across five dimensions of the community readiness model: Knowledge of efforts, Leadership, Community climate, Knowledge of the issue, and Resources for efforts. A general score and a dimension score (mean and standard deviation) were calculated. Scores could range from 1 (no awareness) to 9 (community ownership). Results: In total, 11 respondents, including physicians (n=2), dietitian (n=1), physiotherapists (n=3), speech therapists (n=2), nutritional assistants (n=2), and a manager (n=1) were interviewed. The general community readiness score was 4.0±0.3, indicating the preplanning stage for the implementation of the PG-SGA. All five dimensions were in the preplanning range (3.5-4.5). Resources was lowest (3.5 ± 0.9; range 3.0-4.0), and Knowledge of efforts was highest (4.5 ± 1.9; range 2.0-7.0); the scores of the remaining dimensions clustered around ~4.0. No dimension score exceeded the preplanning stage. Conclusion: Readiness to implement the PG-SGA was uniformly low (ie, at preplanning stage) across CRM dimensions, with resources most limited and awareness of existing efforts highest, yet still in the preplanning stage. Recommendations are directed to hospital leadership/clinical leaders and to interprofessional nutrition teams, with targeted training for all professionals involved in nutritional care to enable progression toward implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.