ArticleMolecular vision2025
DNA amplification from osmicated, plastic-embedded eye tissues.
Article in Molecular vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: In the premolecular era, mammalian samples were embedded in epoxy resin blocks, such as Epon or Poly/Bed, for future evaluation by electron microscopy. However, use of these archival specimens for more modern mutation characterization studies can be challenging. The aim of this study was to determine if genomic DNA could be extracted from osmicated archival epoxy-embedded tissues to a quality suitable for short-amplicon PCR amplification. Methods: We selected nine archived Epon, Araldite, or Poly/Bed embedded blocks of mammalian retinal and corneal tissue that were ~10 mm in length, embedded in the 1970s to 1990s, and had an extensive phenotypic description. Tissues were fixed in several combinations of glutaraldehyde and osmium before embedding. The blocks were shaved of excess resin, fragmented, and digested using an epoxy resin removal solution. The softened plastic was cut with a scalpel, washed, drained, and incubated at 56 °C overnight in a tissue lysis solution containing Proteinase K. Trizol was added to the samples, which were further mechanically homogenized. Chloroform was added, and the samples were centrifuged at 4 °C and 12,000 Results: The extraction success was tested by targeted PCR amplification using primers that produced amplicons 90 to 260 bp in length and targeted genes relevant for inherited eye studies (progressive rod-cone degeneration- Conclusions: By identifying methods to extract DNA from osmicated epoxy-embedded mammalian eye tissues, our results provide a valuable resource for determining the genetic basis of inherited diseases and for retroactively confirming molecular diagnoses based on microscopic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41867383PMC13002340What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.