ArticleMolecular vision2025
Intraocular pressure distribution in old and young cynomolgus monkeys following general anesthesia and mydriasis.
Article in Molecular vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP) distribution of cynomolgus monkeys in different age groups after anesthesia and mydriasis. Methods: A total of 158 young and 252 old cynomolgus monkeys, aged 3.95 (1.61; range, 1.38 to 5.97) and 18.80 (1.67; range, 15.21 to 24.69) years, respectively, were subjected to general anesthesia (intramuscular injection of Zoletil 4 mg/kg mixed with xylazine/ketamine 0.2 mg/kg). IOP was measured using an Icare tonometer at three time points: immediately following the onset of anesthesia, after stabilization but before mydriasis, and after mydriasis (induced by 1% tropicamide eye drops). Results: No significant differences were observed between sexes or between eyes within the Conclusions: The IOP levels of the old
Indexed as
Identifiers
41867373PMC13002336What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.