ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Enhancing Breast Contours After Major Weight Loss: An Observational Study on the Dilemma of Implant Use.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast reshaping is a common request after massive weight loss, yet implant use in this population remains controversial due to higher complication risks and limited comparative data on implant types. Methods: This retrospective study, conducted from January 2016 to December 2022 at a public hospital, included adult female patients who underwent breast reshaping with implants. Exclusion criteria were weight loss through diet/exercise alone, a history of breast cancer, poorly managed comorbidities, and significant psychiatric disorders. The procedures were performed by a consistent surgical team, with implant selection tailored to each patient based on preoperative assessments of breast ptosis and individual expectations. Data analysis included patient demographics, surgical specifics, and postoperative complications. Results: Among the 56 patients studied, 38 received polyurethane implants and 18 received textured implants. The study found no significant differences between these groups regarding age, initial weight, body mass index, weight loss, return to normal activities, patient satisfaction, implant positioning, or complication rates. The overall complication rate was 37.5%, with no significant variation between the 2 implant types. Conclusions: The study underscores the challenges of achieving optimal results in post-massive weight loss breast reshaping due to unique deformities and a higher risk of complications. Despite ongoing debate over the ideal implant type, this research indicated no clear superiority between polyurethane and textured implants. Future research directions should explore newer ultra-light implants and compare implant-based techniques with autologous tissue approaches to further refine outcomes in this patient population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.