Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867321›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2026

Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Utility of Pancreatic Cancer Non-Invasive Test in New-Onset Diabetes.

Adrian Vilalta, Ananya Das, Michael B Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adrian Vilalta *Data Science Department, Outcomes Metrics LLC, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0379-8276
Ananya Das *Arizona Centers for Digestive Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Michael B WallaceDivision of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Most pancreatic cancer (PC) cases are diagnosed at a late stage, leading to poor prognosis. New-onset diabetes (NOD) increases the risk of PC by 6- to 8-fold within the first 3 years of diagnosis. This study aims to assess the clinical utility and economic benefits of early detection of PC in patients with NOD using a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) epigenomic blood test (Avantect; ClearNote Health, CA). Design: A Markov model compares two primary strategies: no testing and testing higher-risk NOD patients using the cfDNA epigenomic test. Using the enriching new-onset diabetes for pancreatic cancer (END-PAC) criteria ≥3, approximately 20% of the NOD patients were at higher risk for PC. The cfDNA epigenomic test has a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 97%. Results: The cfDNA test is robustly cost-effective in NOD high-risk patients, with an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of $56,564 at a Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000; its cost-effectiveness is superior to the standard of care, ie, no testing. In a modeled cohort of 10,000 NOD patients, the no-testing strategy would result in 1% of PC cases, with only 7.1% being eligible for potentially curative surgery. By contrast, cfDNA testing identified 71 cases of PC, with 32.4% of these cases being eligible for surgical resection. Early-stage detection through this approach more than quadruples surgical eligibility and significantly enhances the chances of a cure. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings underscore the transformative clinical and economic value of early PC detection in high-risk patients with NOD. Implementing cfDNA testing during the first three years following diabetes onset has the potential to shift the diagnosis paradigm, leading to early interventions and meaningful improvements in expected survival, while remaining cost-effective.

Indexed as

cell-free DNAcost effectivenessearly detectionepigenomicsnew-onset diabetespancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID41867321
PMCPMC13005627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.