ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2026
Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Utility of Pancreatic Cancer Non-Invasive Test in New-Onset Diabetes.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Most pancreatic cancer (PC) cases are diagnosed at a late stage, leading to poor prognosis. New-onset diabetes (NOD) increases the risk of PC by 6- to 8-fold within the first 3 years of diagnosis. This study aims to assess the clinical utility and economic benefits of early detection of PC in patients with NOD using a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) epigenomic blood test (Avantect; ClearNote Health, CA). Design: A Markov model compares two primary strategies: no testing and testing higher-risk NOD patients using the cfDNA epigenomic test. Using the enriching new-onset diabetes for pancreatic cancer (END-PAC) criteria ≥3, approximately 20% of the NOD patients were at higher risk for PC. The cfDNA epigenomic test has a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 97%. Results: The cfDNA test is robustly cost-effective in NOD high-risk patients, with an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of $56,564 at a Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000; its cost-effectiveness is superior to the standard of care, ie, no testing. In a modeled cohort of 10,000 NOD patients, the no-testing strategy would result in 1% of PC cases, with only 7.1% being eligible for potentially curative surgery. By contrast, cfDNA testing identified 71 cases of PC, with 32.4% of these cases being eligible for surgical resection. Early-stage detection through this approach more than quadruples surgical eligibility and significantly enhances the chances of a cure. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings underscore the transformative clinical and economic value of early PC detection in high-risk patients with NOD. Implementing cfDNA testing during the first three years following diabetes onset has the potential to shift the diagnosis paradigm, leading to early interventions and meaningful improvements in expected survival, while remaining cost-effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.