Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867303›Full record

ArticleACS environmental Au2026

Modeling Elevated Children's Blood Lead Levels across Five U.S. States: A Statistical Approach to Improve Predictions and Understand Key Drivers.

Matthew Dietrich, Rogelio Tornero-Velez, Valerie Zartarian, Lindsay W Stanek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS environmental Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew DietrichOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4464-5340
Rogelio Tornero-VelezOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2102-0548
Valerie ZartarianOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7788-7033
Lindsay W StanekOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9921-7458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaps remain in the interpretability and real-world applicability of children's elevated blood lead level (EBLL) predictive models, which are important for fostering efficient health intervention. We produced predictive statistical models using publicly available population data and children's EBLL rates (≥5 or ≥3.5 μg/dL) at the United States (U.S.) census tract resolution from Michigan (2014-2016), Ohio (2014-2016), California (2018-2022), Minnesota (2017-2021), and Wisconsin (2018-2021). Spatial and nonspatial random forest and logistic regression models were developed for each state to predict whether a census tract was above or below the 75th percentile EBLL rate. Spatial logistic regression models performed the best based on overall predictive performance, evaluated through a 10-fold cross-validation approach. Predictive accuracy ranged from 82% to 90%. The most influential final predictive variables for each optimal model varied, but there were consistencies across states. For example, the percent of homes built before 1940 was significant (

Indexed as

child healthhealth preventionlead (Pb) pollutionpredictive modelingspatial models

Identifiers

PMID41867303
PMCPMC13003365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.