Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867300›Full record

ReviewACS environmental Au2026

Plastic Valorization into Added-Value Products via Microwave and Conventional Pyrolysis: A Review.

Emmanuel Dan, Alan J McCue, Davide Dionisi, Claudia Fernández Martín

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS environmental Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emmanuel DanSchool of Engineering, Chemical Processes and Materials Engineering Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, United Kingdom.
Alan J McCueAdvanced Centre for Energy and Sustainability (ACES), Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4404-6102
Davide DionisiSchool of Engineering, Chemical Processes and Materials Engineering Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, United Kingdom.
Claudia Fernández MartínSchool of Engineering, Chemical Processes and Materials Engineering Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9788-7784

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastics are indispensable due to their versatility and low cost, but their accumulation poses major environmental challenges. Conventional waste management methods like landfilling, incineration, and mechanical recycling are inadequate, spurring interest in advanced valorization techniques. Pyrolysis offers a pathway to convert plastic waste into value-added products; however, traditional pyrolysis is energy-intensive, requiring high temperatures and long reaction times. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis (MAPP) has emerged as a superior alternative, enabling rapid heating (up to 50 °C/min), lower temperatures (≤500 °C), and shorter reaction times (∼10 min). MAP improves energy efficiency, yield, and selectivity toward valuable fractions such as bitumen, toluene, xylene (BTX), and medium-chain olefins. This review uniquely compares conventional pyrolysis and MAP for plastic waste conversion, analyzing process fundamentals, reactor designs, catalyst innovations (hierarchical, metal-modified, regenerable types), and product outcomes. Life cycle assessment data reveal MAP's lower greenhouse gas emissions and water use compared to conventional pyrolysis, landfilling, and incineration. This work also highlights emerging applications, including hydrogen, jet fuel analogues, carbon nanotubes, and CO

Indexed as

catalystsconventional pyrolysisenvironmental impactlife cycle assessmentmicrowave-assisted pyrolysisPlastic wasteproduct selectivitypyrolysissustainability

Identifiers

PMID41867300
PMCPMC13003366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.