Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867291›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of radiology & imaging2026

2D Shear Wave Elastography: An Evolving Technique for Comparison of Placental Elasticity in Normal and Preeclamptic Pregnancy.

Ritika Sihmar, Shahina Bano, Renuka Malik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of radiology & imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ritika SihmarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Shahina BanoDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Renuka MalikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This article evaluates differences in placental elasticity between normal and preeclamptic pregnancies using shear wave elastography and assesses the potential of the placental elasticity values in predicting preeclampsia. Materials and Methods: The study included 60 pregnant women, 30 diagnosed with preeclampsia and 30 with normal pregnancies, in their second and third trimesters. Shear wave elastography was performed to assess placental elasticity. Both mean (average) and maximum elasticity values were recorded and cutoff values were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate their potential in predicting preeclampsia. Results: Placental elasticity values were significantly higher in preeclamptic women (group A) compared with healthy pregnant women (group B). The mean elasticity in group A was 15.74 ± 3.51 kPa, with a maximum elasticity of 27.4 ± 4.66 kPa; whereas in group B, the corresponding values were 4.42 ± 1.93 and 7.13 ± 3.05 kPa, respectively ( Conclusion: The study revealed significant differences in placental elasticity between preeclamptic and healthy pregnancies, highlighting the potential of shear wave elastography as a valuable tool for early prediction of preeclampsia. Early prediction using this method could significantly reduce maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity, especially in developing countries, by identifying cases before the onset of clinical symptoms.

Indexed as

2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE)acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI)kilopascals (kPa)point shear wave elastography (p-SWE)preeclampsia (PE)

Identifiers

PMID41867291
PMCPMC13002261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.