Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867245›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2026

Effects of nutritional supplementation on physical performance and sport-specific skills in volleyball players: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bingran Zhao, Haiting Zhai

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bingran ZhaoSports Coaching College, Beijing Sports University, Beijing, China.
Haiting ZhaiSports Coaching College, Beijing Sports University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nutritional supplementation is widely used to support sports performance; however, evidence specific to volleyball players remains fragmented. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of nutritional supplementation on physical performance and sport-specific skills in competitive volleyball players. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, five electronic databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials investigating acute or chronic nutritional supplementation in healthy volleyball players were included. Outcomes included vertical jump performance, muscle strength, agility, and sport-specific technical skills. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 240 participants were included. Nutritional supplementation was associated with significant improvements in vertical jump performance (SMD = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.70), muscle strength (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.17-0.69), agility (SMD = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.54-1.24), and sport-specific technical skills (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.31-0.95). Subgroup analyses indicated beneficial effects following both acute and chronic supplementation protocols, with minimal statistical heterogeneity across outcomes. Conclusion: Within the available evidence, nutritional supplementation may contribute to improvements in selected physical performance and sport-specific skill outcomes in competitive volleyball players. These findings may inform evidence-based nutritional strategies aimed at supporting sports performance in volleyball, while highlighting the need for larger, ecologically valid trials.

Indexed as

meta-analysisnutritional supplementationphysical performancesport-specific skillssports performancevolleyball

Identifiers

PMID41867245
PMCPMC12999381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.