Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41867218›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Real-Time Kinematic Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Safely Reduces Gait Impairment and Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease.

Shreesh Karjagi, Yasmine M Kehnemouyi, Matthew N Petrucci, Laura Parisi, Emilia F Lambert, Jillian A Melbourne, Pranav Akella, Kevin B Wilkins, Johanna O'Day, Hannah J Dorris and 7 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Shreesh KarjagiDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Yasmine M KehnemouyiDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Matthew N PetrucciDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Laura ParisiDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Emilia F LambertDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Jillian A MelbourneDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Pranav AkellaDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Kevin B WilkinsDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Johanna O'DayDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Hannah J DorrisDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Cameron DiepDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Aryaman S GalaDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Chuyi CuiDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Shannon L HoffmanDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Prerana AcharyyaDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.
Jeffrey A HerronDepartment of Neurological Surgery; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Helen M Bronte-StewartDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA, United States.

Funding

Bilateral Closed Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Freezing of Gait using Neural and Kinematic FeedbackUH3NS107709 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRONTE-STEWART, HELEN · 2019 to 2023
$6.1M
Accelerating Dissemination of Implantable Neurotechnology for Clinical ResearchU24NS113637 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BORTON, DAVID ALLENSON, DENISON, TIMOTHY · 2020 to 2024
$4.4M
Neurostimulation of the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert for the Cognitive-Motor Syndrome in Parkinson's DiseaseUH3NS128150 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Helen Bronte-Stewart · 2024 to 2026
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS113637NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS107709NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS128150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait impairment (GI) and freezing of gait (FOG) affect 80% of patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS) provides limited adaptability to address the episodic nature of FOG due to fixed parameters. Neural biomarkers for adaptive DBS are limited by signal artifacts and poor FOG classification. Wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer a promising alternative by directly measuring signatures of GI&FOG. We developed Kinematic adaptive DBS (KaDBS), the first intelligent system to dynamically modulate stimulation in response to real-time gait metrics. KaDBS integrates bilateral shank-mounted IMUs with an investigational neurostimulator through a wireless architecture enabling step-detection, arrhythmicity calculation, and probabilistic FOG classification. Two control algorithms were implemented: an arrhythmicity model based on stride variability, and a P(FOG) classifier implementing tri-state control based on stepwise freezing probabilities. In the largest KaDBS cohort to date (n=8), we compared OFF, cDBS, KaDBS, and intermittent DBS during harnessed stepping and free walking. KaDBS was safe and well tolerated with no serious adverse events; symptom-free reports were 87.5% and 71.4% for arrhythmicity and P(FOG) models respectively, compared to 50.0% for cDBS. All symptoms were mild, transient, and resolved without intervention. KaDBS significantly reduced percent time freezing versus OFF during stepping-in-place (35.8%, P= 4.80 × 10

Identifiers

PMID41867218
PMCPMC13004075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.