SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Influencing factors for severe pertussis among Chinese children: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study systematically evaluates factors influencing severe pertussis in Chinese children, providing scientific evidence for its prevention and treatment. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang identified literature on factors influencing severe pertussis in Chinese children up to September 30, 2025. We conducted a meta-analysis, and data were combined using either fixed or random models. A total of 24 studies included 839 severe pertussis cases and 4,280 non-severe cases. Severe pertussis was significantly associated with several factors, with the top five strongest associations being: lung consolidation or atelectasis (OR: 15.44; 95%CI: 9.06-26.31), three concave sign (OR: 12.91; 95%CI: 5.46-30.53), elevated C-reactive protein (OR: 5.33; 95%CI: 3.00-9.49), unvaccinated with DTP vaccine (OR: 4.00; 95%CI: 2.86-5.58), and white blood cell count (WMD: 16.42 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.