Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41866964›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Effects of unexpected underfoot perturbations during turning on measures of mediolateral stability and corresponding recovery strategies.

Tyler K Ho, Nicholas Kreter, Cameron Jensen, JunSeop Son, Paula Kramer, Peter C Fino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tyler K HoUniversity of Utah, Department of Health & Kinesiology, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-3332-2071
Nicholas KreterUniversity of Utah, Department of Health & Kinesiology, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1567-6287
Cameron JensenUniversity of Utah, Department of Health & Kinesiology, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9146-311X
JunSeop SonUniversity of Utah, Department of Health & Kinesiology, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-8446-1755
Paula KramerUniversity of Utah, Department of Health & Kinesiology, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-2213-3516
Peter C FinoUniversity of Utah, Department of Health & Kinesiology, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8621-3706

Funding

Interdisciplinary Engineering Career Development Center in Movement and Rehabilitation SciencesK12HD073945 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DEWALD, JULIUS P, REINKENSMEYER, DAVID JAY · 2012 to 2021
$7.9M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development K12HD073945NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD073945NIH HHS K12HD073945University of Utah
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans regularly walk across uneven terrain, which demands reactive control strategies to maintain forward progress and stability. While reactive control during walking has been well described during straight gait, it is unclear how reactive control differs during turning gait. Because turning is asymmetrical, perturbations to the inside and outside limbs may elicit different reactive adjustments. This study investigates how unexpected underfoot perturbations alter stability measures during turning and how individuals alter their foot placement to maintain stability after such perturbations. Seven healthy adults completed walking trials around a circular track while wearing mechanized shoes that pseudo-randomly delivered underfoot perturbations to either the inside or outside limb. We calculated mediolateral margin of stability corrected for centripetal acceleration (ML MoSC), step width and step length from kinematic data. Linear mixed effects models compared the effects of perturbation type (inversion versus eversion) and perturbed limb (inside versus outside) for each outcome measure. ML MoSC was affected by both perturbation type and perturbed limb, with larger changes observed during eversion and outside limb perturbations. Changes to step width and step time during two recovery steps after each perturbation were primarily influenced by the perturbed limb - outside limb perturbations elicited consistent changes during two recovery steps compared with one altered step after inside limb perturbations. Perturbations to the outside limb during turning disrupted gait longer than perturbations to the inside limb. This difference across perturbed limb may indicate that outside steps are more important than inside ones for maintaining and recovering stability during turning.

Indexed as

FootGaitPostural BalanceWalkingAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDynamic balanceGait asymmetryLocomotionMargin of stabilityReactive balance

Identifiers

PMID41866964
PMCPMC13143213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.